Norwegian 737 MAX denied entry into Germany, lands in France

German authorities have refused entry of a Norwegian Boeing 737 MAX 8 into their airspace. The aircraft, which was performing a ferry flight, eventually landed in a Parisian airport.

The Boeing 737 MAX 8 registered SE-RTB of the low-cost carrier Norwegian departed on June 11, 2019, from Malaga airport (AGP), in Spain, to return to the company’s base in Stockholm (ARN), Sweden.

However, as it was about to reach the German border, the aircraft was put on hold and started flying in circles above the French eastern region of Moselle, Flightradar24 data shows. Germany had refused entry into its airspace.

The flight was eventually aborted, and the aircraft had to land in Paris-Vatry airport (XCR) for refueling.

After the two crashes of Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines involving a Boeing 737 MAX 8, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has forbidden the aircraft from operating commercial flights within its airspace. Ferry flights to reposition the planes are still allowed.

However, each European country remains sovereign of its airspace. Unlike France, which allows specific authorizations for ferry flights, Germany’s NOTAM is unequivocal: “any flight with the types Boeing 737 MAX 8 and Boeing 837 MAX 9 within the airspace of the Federal Republic of Germany is prohibited”.

Thus, while Norwegian claims that the flight had been approved by Eurocontrol, it will now have to rethink the flight route for its Boeing 737 MAX to reach Stockholm.

Such occurrences are rare, as flight routes are planned ahead. But on November 1, 2018, the entrance of Air France flight AF258 into the Russian airspace had been denied forcing the plane to turn back and, after unsuccessful landing attempt in Warsaw, return to Paris.

 

Source: https://bit.ly/2WFAMgL

Image: Edward Russell

American Airlines extends flight cancellations on Boeing 737 MAX through 3 September

“American Airlines remains confident that impending software updates to the Boeing 737 MAX, along with the new training elements Boeing is developing in coordination with our union partners, will lead to recertification of the aircraft soon“, the airline said in a statement. “We have been in continuous contact with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT), National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and other regulatory authorities, and we are pleased with the progress to date.”

In April, American extended cancellations for the MAX through 19 August and has now decided to extend those cancellations through Sept. 3: “By extending the cancellations, our customers and team members can more reliably plan their upcoming travel on American. In total, approximately 115 flights per day will be cancelled through Sept. 3.

Our Reservations and Sales teams will continue to work closely with customers who are impacted by these cancellations.”

Frequently asked questions

Question: My flight was previously scheduled on a MAX. Will it be cancelled?
Answer: Not all flights that were previously scheduled on a MAX will be cancelled, as we plan to substitute other aircraft types. In total, approximately 115 flights will be cancelled per day.

Question: My flight wasn’t scheduled to be on a MAX. Why has it been cancelled?
Answer: A flight that was not scheduled as a MAX flight might be cancelled to enable our team to cover a MAX route with a different aircraft. Our goal is to minimise the impact to the smallest number of customers.

Question: How will customers know if they are impacted?
Answer: American’s Reservations team will contact affected customers directly by email or telephone. Customers who booked through a travel agent will be contacted by their agency directly.

Question: My flight was cancelled and I don’t want to rebook. Can I get a refund?
Answer: Yes. If a flight is cancelled and a customer chooses to not be rebooked, they may request a full refund by visiting aa.com/refunds.

 

Source: https://bit.ly/2WzFYT9

Image: American Airlines Boeing 737 MAX

IATA hopes for coordinated return of the Boeing 737 MAX

IATA renewed its call to global aviation regulators for a coordinated approval of Boeing 737 MAX navigation system changes.

Alexandre de Juniac, IATA’s Director General and CEO, voiced his concern on the damaging effects that the two Boeing 737 MAX crashes had on the trust in the aviation industry, in the air transport industry report dated June 2, 2019.

“The recent Boeing 737 MAX accidents have put our reputation in the spotlight,” states de Juniac, adding that “trust in the certification system has been damaged—among regulators, between regulators and the industry and with the flying public. […] To be clear, I am not advocating for knee-jerk reactions. But governments and industry must find a way to maintain public confidence in safety with fast and coordinated responses”.

Indeed, suspicion of alleged collusion between the FAA and Boeing during the certification process of the Boeing 737 MAX has led several regulators to express will for conducting their independent certification.

Transport Canada (the Canadian transport safety authority) was the first to announce it would run its own investigation. “When the software update will be done within a few weeks, we will do our own certification in Canada, even though it has been certified by the FAA,” Marc Garneau, Minister of Transport, told the press.

Source: https://bit.ly/2WjCi2J

Image: PJS2005

Sydney-London non-stop service: can Qantas make it work?

Major airlines around the globe are pushing the limits and capabilities of next-generation aircraft by increasingly targeting long-haul and super-haul flights across continents. One such ambitious project is underway for Qantas – Australia’s national carrier is expecting top manufacturers to present their final offers for the ultra-long-haul aircraft that would be operated on the planned Sydney-London route, set to be the world’s longest commercial flight when it is launched in 2023. The ultra-comfortable passenger experience boasted about by the airline’s CEO, on the other hand, may not come to fruition.

Last year, on May 24th, Qantas launched what it hailed as “historic” non-stop service between Perth and London. The over 9,000 mile (14,500 km) flight operated by Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner took just over 17 hours to complete. But this service was just a warm-up before the airline rolls-out direct flights from Sydney to London and New York.

In 2017, Qantas’ CEO Alan Joyce announced the airline is targeting direct flights from the east coast of Australia to London and New York by 2022, Bloomberg reported at the time. It was planned that the Sydney-London service would take 20 hours, 20 minutes, while the Sydney-New York route would be covered in 18 hours, 7 minutes.

Other possible routes envisioned at the time would have included Paris, Rio de Janeiro and Cape Town, linking Australia directly to major cities in the Americas, Europe and Africa, and thus, revolutionizing air travel in Australia.

To make the super-haul flight viable, Joyce turned to the world’s leading aircraft manufacturers – Airbus and Boeing. Latest report from Aviator.aero indicates the airline has asked the plane makers to present their “best and final offer” for long-haul jetliners capable of the up to 21-hour flight between Sydney to London by August 2019. The choice is between the ultra-long-range Airbus A350 and the Boeing 777X, various media sources indicate.

As is the case, the main challenge for the Airbus and Boeing is range and capability: the aircraft manufacturer would have to configure a jetliner that could fly about 300 passengers farther than any regular service to date. For instance, the Boeing 787-9, operating the Perth-London route, is configured with a total seat count of 236 passengers.

“Farther” also means beating Singapore Airlines (SIA), which made headlines last year when it re-launched its non-stop Singapore-New York service, becoming the world’s longest commercial flight. Launched on October 11, 2018, the inaugural flight lasted 17 hours, 52 minutes covering some 9,500 miles (15,300 km).

The service is operated by one of the carrier’s Airbus A350-900ULR (Ultra Long Range) jets, a variant of the A350 XWB Family aircraft ordered specifically for such long distance flights. Configured in a two-class layout, the jetliner can seat 161 passengers.

According to Forbes estimations, on average, SIA’s Singapore-New York service covers 9,534 miles taking up to 18 hours, 30 minutes. The introduction of this service dethroned Qatar Airways’ Auckland-Doha service as the world’s longest flight. Operated by Boeing 777-200LR (Long Range) the Qatar Airways’ 9,032 mile-long route takes 17 hours, 50 minutes.

For now, Qantas’ Perth – London service comes at third place, covering 9,009 miles and lasting 17 hours, 25 minutes. This new service, in turn, overtook Emirates’ Dubai – Auckland non-stop flights that covered 8,824 miles, lasting 17 hours, 10 minutes (operated by Airbus A380).

Qantas’s ambitious endeavor, amplified somewhat to the likes of a space mission or a secret defense project by its name, is called Project Sunrise. Embedded in the project was the enthusiasm to come up with creative ideas to enhance passenger experience on the grueling up to 20-hour flight (forget all the usual in-flight entertainment). To take it up a notch, Joyce teased introducing gym, bar, and sleeping areas, as well as child-care facilities, on board the aircraft.

According to the latest report by Bloomberg, Qantas may have to scrap all those plans for bunks, beds, and a gym. The planes proposed for the Sydney-London and Sydney-New York by Airbus and Boeing meet the range capabilities, however, neither can carry the weight that Qantas initially planned (aside from the various facilities and the up to 300 passenger count, the airplane would have to be able to carry more fuel for unexpected headwinds and emergencies).

And there are other hurdles ahead as well: Qantas needs to reach a new agreement with pilots, who would be subject to longer working hours that the ultra-long-flights will require. The carrier also needs the necessary regulatory approvals. As for now, whether the airline chooses Airbus or Boeing, the aircraft would be delivered in 2022 and the first flights could be expected in 2023, Bloomberg cites Joyce as saying.

Source: http://twixar.me/lT8n

Image: BriYYZ (CC BY-SA 2.0)

No Boeing 737 MAX for the summer